AI Filing Risk Report
Audience: managing_partner
Scope: matched corpus
Evidence At A Glance
Corpus2,036 tracked global matters
Corpus checked2026-09-10
Latest tracked decision2026-09-08
Matched set100 cases
Date coverage2026-08-06 to 2026-09-08
Source-link coverage100/100 (100%)
BoundaryPublic incidents; not usage-adjusted rates or legal advice
Priority Controls
Verify every cited authority in a primary legal research source before filing.
Compare every quotation and cited proposition against the actual source text.
Require supervising attorney signoff for court-facing AI-assisted work.
Observed Signals
fake-citations: 78
misrepresented-authority: 43
fabricated-quotes: 36
bar-referral: 7
landlord-tenant: 3
published-opinion: 2
citation-verification: 77
authority-support-verification: 59
incident-response: 37
disclosure-compliance: 1
Source-Linked Examples
Capital Standard, LLC v. U.S. Bank National Association (2026-08-21, CA Florida (2d)): high; monetary, struck-filing, bar-referral, professional / $1.5K
Source: open source
Unspecified murder appeal (Las Cruces area) (2026-08-21, New Mexico SC): high; monetary, bar-referral, professional / $5.0K
Source: open source
Douglas v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (2026-09-03, D.C. Court of Appeals): high; bar-referral
Source: open source
Morgan Cole v. Hobby Town Unlimited, Inc. (2026-09-02, C.D. Illinois): high; monetary, bar-referral, professional
Source: open source
Thomas Raynard James v. Detective Kevin Conley, et al. (2026-08-27, S.D. Florida): high; bar-referral
Source: open source
