133 Blackstock Road v Assethold Limited
First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) · Nov 17, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)
- Record ID
- 133-blackstock-road-v-assethold-limited-2025-11-17
- Observed outcome
- Show Cause
- Known monetary consequence
- costs ordered, amount not stated
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent relied on Gala Unity Ltd v Ariadne Road RTM Co Ltd [2012] UKUT 366 (LC); Tribunal could not find this authority and directed the Respondent to produce it; none was provided and Tribunal concluded it apparently does not exist. Outcome: Show Cause.
Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent relied on Gala Unity Ltd v Ariadne Road RTM Co Ltd [2012] UKUT 366 (LC); Tribunal could not find this authority and directed the Respondent to produce it; none was provided and Tribunal concluded it apparently does not exist. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Respondent subsequently cited Gala Unity Ltd v Ariadne Road RTM Co Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1372, but the Court of Appeal decision concerned a different issue (management of separate properties) and did not support the Respondent's proposition about retained insurance rights. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Respondent relied on Qdime Ltd v Bath Building (Swindon) Management Co Ltd [2014] UKUT 0261 (LC) as supporting the proposition that lease terms prevail over RTM management functions; Tribunal found the case existed but did not involve RTM and did not support that proposition. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Respondent cited A1 Properties (Sunderland) Ltd v Tudor Studios RTM Company Ltd [2024] UKSC 27 as confirming that RTM rights do not override express lease provisions; Tribunal found the Supreme Court decision concerned a failure to serve a claim notice and did not establish the principle asserted.
UK property tribunals now issue show-cause orders when authorities cannot be produced — treat failure to supply a cite as sanction-triggering.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Trial
- Monetary
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- No tool named in source
- Known monetary consequence
- costs ordered, amount not stated
- Procedural posture
- Show Cause
naturalandartificiallaw.com
Secondary or other linked source. The recorded link is not classified as an official court source or docket mirror.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Secondary Source Only (medium confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Assign a responsible reviewer for AI-assisted research and drafting.
- Retain a matter-level record of source checks and corrections.