Corpus checked
The upstream public dataset was checked and validated on this date. The latest tracked decision is Jul 21, 2026.
Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence transparency
Methodology and source record
How matters enter the corpus, how classifications are applied, what the tracker can and cannot establish, and how to inspect or correct the underlying record.
Corpus records1,796
Non-alleged1,781
Source-linked100%
Countries covered41
What the tracker covers
AI Vortex tracks public court matters, orders, disciplinary records, and other documented legal proceedings in which generative AI, fabricated authority, inaccurate quotations, unsupported propositions, or related verification failures are part of the public record.
Inclusion standard
- A publicly identifiable legal matter or proceeding exists.
- A source document or attributable public record supports inclusion.
- The record contains a legal AI issue, verification failure, or closely related allegation.
- The matter can be classified without inventing facts absent from the source.
“Non-alleged” is a corpus flag, not proof of a final adjudicated misconduct finding. Warnings, show-cause orders, procedural rulings, and final outcomes require separate reading of the underlying record.
Classification framework
Severity
Severity summarizes the observed procedural, monetary, professional, or case-level consequence. It is an editorial research classification, not a prediction of future sanctions.
Failure modes
Failure tags can overlap. A single matter may contain fake citations, fabricated quotations, and misrepresented authority. Charts must therefore be read as observed signals, not mutually exclusive categories.
AI tools
Tool names are recorded only when identified in the public record. “Unidentified” does not imply that a specific vendor was involved. Incident counts are never usage-adjusted failure rates.
Source and review hierarchy
- Official court or government source: a link hosted by a court or government domain.
- Docket or legal-document mirror: a repository preserving the filing, order, or opinion.
- Publisher archive: an upstream document archive that may preserve the relevant record but is not the issuing court.
- Secondary or other link: contextual material that requires additional source review.
Source tier describes where the link points. It does not certify that AI Vortex independently verified every field. Explicit review metadata is presently sparse, so users should treat the linked document as controlling and report discrepancies for review.
Indexing gate: all 1,796 records have stable public URLs. 1,781 currently pass both the deterministic publication baseline and the evidence-specific intelligence gate; 15 remain accessible for research but excluded from indexing until their documented evidence gaps are resolved.
Current review program: source traceability and correction intake are live. A corpus-wide independent field-by-field review is not represented as complete.
Updates, corrections, and reproducibility
Source and classification review
New documents, changed outcomes, and corrections are incorporated into later snapshots.
Correction review
Submit a case, source link, court order, or correction with supporting documentation.