534246-07-22
Enforcement and Collection Authority, Central District Maintenance Track · Nov 2, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- Enforcement and Collection Authority, Central District Maintenance Track
- Record ID
- 534246-07-22-2025-11-02
- Observed outcome
- The registrar denied the debtor's request to overturn the prior decision and imposed a monetary sanction of 1,000 ILS, to be added to the debt.
- Known monetary consequence
- ₪1,000
Why this matter warrants attention
The registrar sanctioned a pro se debtor 1,000 ILS for submitting a filing containing fabricated and misrepresented case law. The decision-maker explicitly identified the use of AI as a source of these erroneous citations, warning that parties must ensure the accuracy of their submissions regardless of the tools used to draft them.
Fabricated: Case Law || Misrepresented: Case Law
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in Enforcement and Collection Authority, Central District Maintenance Track, with the listed outcome: Monetary Sanction.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Administrative
- Trial
- Monetary
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- ₪1,000
- Procedural posture
- The matter arose from a debtor's request (Request No. 67) to overturn a prior enforcement decision dated October 15, 2025, within the Enforcement and Collection Authority, Central District Maintenance Track.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The registrar explicitly mentions the use of AI in the context of the fabricated citations.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Confirm that every authority actually supports the proposition for which it is offered.
- Escalate and correct a suspect filing promptly, with a documented response.