Actmore Estate Limited v Yat Chun Catering Limited
Lands Tribunal · Nov 18, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Record ID
- actmore-estate-limited-v-yat-chun-catering-limited-2025-11-18
- Observed outcome
- Application dismissed
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Legal Norm | The respondent cited a purported Hong Kong statute called the Landlord and Tenant (Commercial Premises) Ordinance. The tribunal stated that the ordinance does not exist and presumed the reference was generated by artificial intelligence. Outcome: Application dismissed.
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Application dismissed. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Application dismissed in Lands Tribunal. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Landlord Tenant
- Trial
- Case Dismissed
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Application dismissed
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.