Adams v. Matrix Providers Inc. et al.
D. Colorado · Aug 27, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- D. Colorado
- Record ID
- adams-v-matrix-providers-inc-et-al-2026-08-27
- Observed outcome
- Admonishment; Monetary Fine
- Known monetary consequence
- $1,000
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Filed a phantom/non-existent case citation in briefing (identified at hearing and in show-cause response). Court and opposing counsel flagged it as fake and potentially AI-generated. Outcome: Admonishment; Monetary Fine.
The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Admonishment; Monetary Fine. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Admonishment; Monetary Fine in D. Colorado. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Employment
- Trial
- Monetary
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- $1,000
- Procedural posture
- Admonishment; Monetary Fine
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.