Agravo de Instrumento NPU 0032636-27.2025.8.16.0000 (Petry v. Evanlux Esquadrias Ltda.)
TJPR - 15ª Câmara Cível · Jun 24, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- TJPR - 15ª Câmara Cível
- Record ID
- agravo-de-instrumento-npu-0032636-27-2025-8-16-0000-petry-v-evanlux-esquadrias-ltda-2025-06-24
- Observed outcome
- Court upheld 5% fine for litigância de má-fé and ordered referral to OAB/PR for investigation (related to use of AI-generated, non-existent precedents).
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Agravantes cited precedents that were not found in the TJPR database; court determined these were invented by an AI tool and thus non-existent jurisprudence. Outcome: Court upheld 5% fine for litigância de má-fé and ordered referral to OAB/PR for investigation (related to use of AI-generated, non-existent precedents).. The court found that the appellants (through their attorney) cited precedents that do not exist and were generated by an AI tool. For failing to verify the AI output and thereby risking misleading the court, the tribunal affirmed a 5% fine for litigância de má-fé and authorized sending an ofício to the OAB/PR to investigate the lawyer's conduct. The decision stresses the duty of care to review AI-produced material and cites similar precedents condemning the use of fabricated jurisprudence.
The structured public record identifies fake citations and trial and records Court upheld 5% fine for litigância de má-fé and ordered referral to OAB/PR for investigation (related to use of AI-generated, non-existent precedents).. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and trial with Court upheld 5% fine for litigância de má-fé and ordered referral to OAB/PR for investigation (related to use of AI-generated, non-existent precedents). in TJPR - 15ª Câmara Cível. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Trial
- Bar Referral
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Court upheld 5% fine for litigância de má-fé and ordered referral to OAB/PR for investigation (related to use of AI-generated, non-existent precedents).
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.