Aguilar v. The Crawford Group, Inc.
D. Massachusetts · Sep 25, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- D. Massachusetts
- Record ID
- aguilar-v-the-crawford-group-inc-2026-09-25
- Observed outcome
- Adverse Costs Order; Pro hac vice status revoked
- Known monetary consequence
- $10,000
Why this matter warrants attention
Misrepresented: Case Law | The brief cited Rodriguez for the proposition that defendants were barred from filing additional Rule 12 motions, but Rodriguez did not mention Rule 12 and did not support that proposition. Outcome: Adverse Costs Order; Pro hac vice status revoked.
The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Adverse Costs Order; Pro hac vice status revoked. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Adverse Costs Order; Pro hac vice status revoked in D. Massachusetts. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Tort
- Trial
- Monetary
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- $10,000
- Procedural posture
- Adverse Costs Order; Pro hac vice status revoked
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.