Alamleh c. R.
SC Quebec · Feb 11, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- SC Quebec
- Record ID
- alamleh-c-r-2026-02-11
- Observed outcome
- The application for an extension of time to appeal the conviction was dismissed.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court dismissed the applicant's request for an extension of time to appeal. While the court did not impose a specific sanction for the AI-generated errors, it explicitly criticized the applicant's failure to verify his submissions, noting that such lapses undermine the administration of justice and can negatively impact the court's assessment of the applicant's credibility.
Fabricated: Case Law | Representations contained references to inexistent case law identified on review by the Court. || Fabricated: Legal Norm | Representations cited an inexistent statute described as the 'Code of Criminal Procedure'. || Fabricated: Case Law | Included inexistent paragraph/pinpoint references to existing judgments (invented paragraph numbers). || Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | Contained inaccurate/misstated references to the judgment on conviction.
Pro-se criminal appellant cited a non-existent Code of Criminal Procedure — courts catch invented statutes as fast as invented cases.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fabricated: Case Law
- Fabricated: Legal Norm
- Fabricated: Pinpoint References
- Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- AI attribution
- Admitted
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Application for extension of time to file an appeal from conviction.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The applicant admitted to using a generative AI tool.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.