Alaya Coleman v. RPF-Somers Investors, LLC, et al.
E.D. Wisconsin · Nov 4, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- E.D. Wisconsin
- Record ID
- alaya-coleman-v-rpf-somers-investors-llc-et-al-2025-11-04
- Observed outcome
- The motion to remand was denied; the court ordered the plaintiff to file a compliant amended complaint by December 4, 2025, or face dismissal.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The Court acknowledged the Defendants' allegation that the pro se Plaintiff hallucinated case law citations. While the Court agreed the Plaintiff's cited authority was inapplicable, it did not formally adjudicate the existence of fabricated citations or impose sanctions for them, focusing instead on procedural deficiencies and Rule 8 compliance.
False Quotes: Case Law | The Removing Defendants contended that Plaintiff 'hallucinates nonexistent quotes from cases' in support of her remand argument; the Court agreed the cited authority was inapplicable but did not identify or quote a specific fabricated citation.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in E.D. Wisconsin, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Failure modes and consequences
- Hallucinated_citations
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Tort
- Trial
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The Court denied the Plaintiff's motion to remand, denied her motion for default judgment, and denied her motion for leave to file an amended complaint, while also denying the Defendants' motions to dismiss without prejudice.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The source identifies the use of AI as implied.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Confirm that every authority actually supports the proposition for which it is offered.