Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-05MS83ZGenerated August 16, 2026Evidence checked Aug 16, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Apelação Cível nº 1.0000.25.331707-7/001 (Silvio Xavier dos Santos v. Estado de Minas Gerais)

TJMG · Nov 27, 2025

Jurisdiction
international
Court
TJMG
Record ID
apelacao-civel-no-1-0000-25-331707-7-001-silvio-xavier-dos-santos-v-estado-de-minas-gerais-2025-11-27
Observed outcome
Court ordered notification to OAB/MG for apuração de responsabilidade disciplinar related to the presentation of nonexistent jurisprudence; no professional sanction yet.
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

Fabricated: Case Law | Citation presented in the appeal that the court could not locate in STJ/TJMG databases; court found it nonexistent. Outcome: Court ordered notification to OAB/MG for apuração de responsabilidade disciplinar related to the presentation of nonexistent jurisprudence; no professional sanction yet.. The appellant submitted several jurisprudential citations that, upon the court's independent search of STJ and TJMG portals, were found not to exist. The appellant acknowledged the authorities were drawn from AI-assisted research platforms but did not identify the specific tool. The court held that use of AI is permitted but does not relieve lawyers of the duty to verify sources; it found the presentation of nonexistent jurisprudence serious, ordered the court registry to notify OAB/MG to investigate disciplinary responsibility under art. 77, §6º CPC/2015, and warned of possible sanctions. No disciplinary sanction was imposed in the decision itself.

Why the decision-maker cared

The structured public record identifies fake citations and trial and records Court ordered notification to OAB/MG for apuração de responsabilidade disciplinar related to the presentation of nonexistent jurisprudence; no professional sanction yet.. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.

Why it matters now

This matter connects fake citations and trial with Court ordered notification to OAB/MG for apuração de responsabilidade disciplinar related to the presentation of nonexistent jurisprudence; no professional sanction yet. in TJMG. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Fake Citations
  • Trial
  • None Adjudicated
AI attribution
Not Established
Recorded tool
Unidentified
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Court ordered notification to OAB/MG for apuração de responsabilidade disciplinar related to the presentation of nonexistent jurisprudence; no professional sanction yet.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
  2. Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.