Apelação Cível nº 1032884-04.2025.8.26.0224
TJ San Paulo · Aug 13, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- TJ San Paulo
- Record ID
- apelacao-civel-no-1032884-04-2025-8-26-0224-2026-08-13
- Observed outcome
- Monetary Fine; Bar Referral
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Attorney cited non-existent judicial precedents produced by an AI tool in the initial petition; court treated the citations as fabricated case law and relied on that finding to recognize litigância de má-fé. Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral. The court determined that the author's attorney used an AI tool without critical review to generate and cite non-existent jurisprudential precedents in the initial petition. The conduct was held to constitute litigância de má-fé; the court imposed a procedural fine (2% of the updated value of the cause) and ordered that the decision be forwarded to the OAB for possible professional measures, reasoning that using AI to fabricate authorities undermines the integrity of the judicial debate and violates duties of probity and good faith.
The structured public record identifies fake citations and bar referral and records Monetary Fine; Bar Referral. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in TJ San Paulo. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Bar Referral
- Contract
- Trial
- Monetary
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Monetary Fine; Bar Referral
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.