Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Richard Louis Pazdernik, Jr.
Iowa SC Attorney Disciplinary Board · Oct 31, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- state
- Court
- Iowa SC Attorney Disciplinary Board
- Record ID
- attorney-disciplinary-board-v-richard-louis-pazdernik-jr-2025-10-31
- Observed outcome
- Public reprimand
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
In Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Richard Louis Pazdernik, Jr., No. 25-1618, the Iowa Supreme Court recorded the Board’s reprimand after proof of service and no timely exception from the respondent. The court ordered the reprimand included in its records as a public document, making the disciplinary disposition publicly accessible through the court’s official record.
Fabricated: Case Law || Misrepresented: Case Law
Unverified ChatGPT output in an Iowa filing will land you a published Supreme Court reprimand on your record.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Other
- Trial
- Professional
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- ChatGPT
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Public reprimand
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
ChatGPT is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Limited (medium confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Use only approved research and drafting tools for legal work.
- Train lawyers and staff to identify and verify generated legal content.