Ava Naeini v. Confluent Inc.
CA California · Jan 29, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- state
- Court
- CA California
- Record ID
- ava-naeini-v-confluent-inc-2026-01-29
- Observed outcome
- The judgment of the trial court was affirmed, and the respondent was awarded costs on appeal.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court identified that the pro se appellant included multiple fabricated or invalid case citations in her appellate brief. The court did not impose a specific sanction for the use of AI or fabricated citations, but it deemed the appellant's arguments forfeited because they lacked valid legal authority and failed to comply with appellate procedural rules.
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'Green v. Casa Santa Fe (2001) 94 Cal.App.4th 638'; the court found the citation is not valid and was unable to locate the purported authority. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'Green v. Casa Santa Fe (2001) 132 Cal.App.4th 97'; the court noted this citation does not appear to be valid.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA California, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Failure modes and consequences
- Hallucinated_case_law
- Procedural_noncompliance
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Employment
- Appellate
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Appellate review of a trial court judgment sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The court noted the presence of invalid citations, implying the use of an external generation tool.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.