A'Vard v Mornington Peninsula SC
Victorian CAT · Dec 2, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- Victorian CAT
- Record ID
- avard-v-mornington-peninsula-sc-2025-12-02
- Observed outcome
- The Tribunal set aside the responsible authority's decision and ordered that no planning permit be granted.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The Tribunal identified that the self-represented applicant used AI to generate non-existent case law citations. The decision-maker explicitly disregarded these fabricated citations, noting they were incorrect, and instead applied the established legal principles from the genuine 'Healy v Surf Coast SC' authority to resolve the dispute.
Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant (self-represented) used AI to cite 'Healy v Boroondara CC'; Tribunal proceeded on the basis the AI citation was incorrect and applied the established Healy principles instead. || Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant (self-represented) used AI to cite 'Healy v Bayside CC'; Tribunal proceeded on the basis the AI citation was incorrect and applied the established Healy principles instead.
Victorian CAT is proceeding past AI cites by applying the real underlying authority — courts will no longer be derailed by fake names.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Administrative
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Admitted
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Application for review of a failure to grant a planning permit under section 79 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 (Vic).
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The applicant admitted using artificial intelligence but did not specify the tool.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.