Azar c. Université de Montréal
Quebec CA · Nov 13, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- Quebec CA
- Record ID
- azar-c-université-de-montréal-2025-11-13
- Observed outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with legal costs.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The Quebec Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant's request for leave to appeal. The court explicitly noted that the applicant relied on non-existent case law, which the respondent attributed to AI hallucinations, and that the applicant failed to provide any explanation for these citations.
Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant relied on numerous case-law authorities that the Respondent demonstrated do not exist; Respondent characterized them as likely AI-generated hallucinations and the court noted the applicant gave no explanation.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in Quebec CA, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Administrative
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- AI (unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Application for leave to appeal from a Superior Court judgment dismissing safeguard measures.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The respondent suggested the non-existent cases were the result of AI hallucinations.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.