Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-04OX779Generated September 11, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Berry v. Stewart

D. Kansas · Nov 14, 2024

Jurisdiction
federal
Court
D. Kansas
Record ID
berry-v-stewart-2024-11-14
Observed outcome
The court ordered counsel to show cause at an in-person hearing why they should not be sanctioned or referred to disciplinary authorities.
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The court issued a show cause order requiring defense counsel to explain the inclusion of a fabricated forum-selection clause and a non-existent case citation in their briefing. The court scheduled a hearing to determine if sanctions under Rule 11 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927 are warranted and whether to refer counsel to disciplinary boards.

Why the decision-maker cared

The court reasoned that the briefing cited a forum-selection clause not found in the parties' contract and a non-existent case, Hogan v. Allstate Insurance Co., which failed verification against CM/ECF records and district docketing standards.

Why it matters now

Quoting contract language not in the record is a Rule 11 trap; cross-check every quoted clause against the filed document.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Fake Citations
  • Fabricated Quotes
  • Contract
  • Trial
  • None Adjudicated
AI attribution
Not Established
Recorded tool
Unidentified
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Order to Show Cause issued November 14, 2024, requiring counsel to appear at a hearing on December 11, 2024.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
  2. Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
  3. Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.