Beschluss 5 U 1/25
OLG Celle · Apr 29, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- OLG Celle
- Record ID
- beschluss-5-u-125-2025-04-29
- Observed outcome
- Court treated the cited authorities as Fehlzitate (not verifiable) and did not rely on them
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited an OLG München decision (12.11.2015, 23 U 2003/15) which the court found to be a Fehlzitat and not retrievable on juris or beck-online. Outcome: Court treated the cited authorities as Fehlzitate (not verifiable) and did not rely on them.
The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Court treated the cited authorities as Fehlzitate (not verifiable) and did not rely on them; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
German courts will silently discard Fehlzitate—unverified citations waste advocacy even without formal sanction.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Court treated the cited authorities as Fehlzitate (not verifiable) and did not rely on them
voris.wolterskluwer-online.de
Secondary or other linked source. The recorded link is not classified as an official court source or docket mirror.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded link is a secondary or other public source and should be checked against the docket where available. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Latest evidence review: Secondary Source Only (medium confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Apply the same source-checking controls to AI (implied, unspecified) output as to any other research input.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.