Beus Gilbert PLLC v. Brigham Young University et al.
D. Utah · Sep 9, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- D. Utah
- Record ID
- beus-gilbert-pllc-v-brigham-young-university-et-al-2026-09-09
- Observed outcome
- Two AI-ethics CLE courses; Monetary Sanctions
- Known monetary consequence
- $3,000
Why this matter warrants attention
Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel attributed language concerning an egregious-misconduct standard for vacatur to Denver & Rio Grande, but the court found that the case contains none of the terms “egregious” or “misconduct” and does not address that standard. Outcome: Two AI-ethics CLE courses; Monetary Sanctions. Order to Show Cause is here.
The structured public record identifies fake citations and misrepresented authority and records Two AI-ethics CLE courses; Monetary Sanctions. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority with Two AI-ethics CLE courses; Monetary Sanctions in D. Utah. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Other
- Trial
- Monetary
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- ClearBrief, Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini
- Known monetary consequence
- $3,000
- Procedural posture
- Two AI-ethics CLE courses; Monetary Sanctions
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
ClearBrief, Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.