Borsody v. Frontier Heritage Communities
D. Kansas · Nov 4, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- D. Kansas
- Record ID
- borsody-v-frontier-heritage-communities-2025-11-04
- Observed outcome
- The Court granted the defendant's motion to dismiss and issued an admonition to the pro se plaintiff regarding the use of AI and citation accuracy.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The Court issued a formal admonition to the pro se plaintiff after she included a non-existent case citation in her response brief, which the Court attributed to the use of generative artificial intelligence. The plaintiff was warned to verify the accuracy of all legal citations and to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's response cited 'Alford v. City of Canon City, 2019 WL 13202842, at *3 (D. Colo. Mar. 29, 2019),' which neither the Court nor defense counsel could locate; Court treated it as a non-existent citation and admonished plaintiff to verify AI-generated citations.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Kansas, with the listed outcome: Warning.
Failure modes and consequences
- Hallucinated_case_law
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Civil Rights
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- Generative artificial intelligence (unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The Court granted the defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and denied the plaintiff's motion for entry of default and sanctions.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The Court inferred the use of generative artificial intelligence.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.