Brick v. Gallatin County, et al.
D. Montana · Dec 1, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- D. Montana
- Record ID
- brick-v-gallatin-county-et-al-2025-12-01
- Observed outcome
- The Court granted the defendants' motions to dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint in its entirety.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The Court dismissed the plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint after finding it violated Rule 8, failed to state a plausible claim, and sought to relitigate state court judgments. The Court explicitly noted the plaintiff's use of fabricated case citations and mischaracterized legal authorities, which persisted despite prior judicial warnings to cease such practices.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case 'Beville v. City of Quitman, Texas, 21 F.4th 917 (5th Cir. 2021)'; the Court found the citation does not exist and directed attention to other actual cases. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on Bevill v. Fletcher (26 F.4th 270) as supporting that a judge's pretrial declaration of guilt removes judicial immunity or supports a §1983 retaliation claim; the Court found Plaintiff mischaracterized the actual holdings.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Montana, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Failure modes and consequences
- Hallucinated_case_law
- Misrepresented_legal_authority
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Civil Rights
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The Court granted the defendants' motions to dismiss the plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint with prejudice.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Confirm that every authority actually supports the proposition for which it is offered.