Broadwater Tower
Queensland BCCMC · Feb 2, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- Queensland BCCMC
- Record ID
- broadwater-tower-2026-02-02
- Observed outcome
- The adjudicator issued a warning regarding the use of AI tools and directed the applicant to revise the application to correct fabricated statutory citations.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The adjudicator issued a warning to the applicant regarding the use of generative AI tools that produced fabricated statutory citations. The applicant was directed to revise the application by removing references to non-existent or misattributed provisions and to verify all legal content against official Queensland legislation sources.
Fabricated: Legal Norm | Applicant cited s 227 of the Act as a provision about 'abuse of power and retaliatory conduct'; adjudicator found s 227 actually pertains to the meaning of 'dispute' and flagged the citation as incorrect. || Fabricated: Legal Norm | Applicant cited s 205(6) of the Act as relating to 'non-existent body corporate records'; adjudicator found s 205(6) concerns the giving of a body corporate certificate, not the claimed record-keeping obligation. || Fabricated: Legal Norm | Applicant cited s 167 of the Act as a provision pertaining to 'oppression and interference with services'; adjudicator observed s 167 actually relates to nuisances caused by occupiers.
AI routinely invents statutory content; read the actual section text before citing any provision.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Administrative
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- Generative AI tools (unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Interim order application in a body corporate dispute.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The adjudicator attributed the errors to the use of generative AI tools and chatbots.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.