Carter v. City of Buffalo
W.D. New York · Sep 8, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- W.D. New York
- Record ID
- carter-v-city-of-buffalo-2026-09-08
- Observed outcome
- Warning
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Misrepresented: Case Law | The Court stated that Carter continued to use case law that did not support the propositions for which it was cited, but did not identify individual citations or explain the deficiencies in each authority. Outcome: The Court warned that future misuse of artificial intelligence may result in sanctions.. The Court suspected that Carter may have used artificial intelligence to prepare her amended complaint because she continued to rely on case law that did not support the propositions asserted, despite the Court's prior instructions. The decision does not identify particular fabricated citations or false quotations, and no sanction was imposed in this order. Carter was warned that future misuse of artificial intelligence in submissions could result in sanctions.
The structured public record identifies pro se and misrepresented authority and records The Court warned that future misuse of artificial intelligence may result in sanctions.. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects pro se and misrepresented authority with The Court warned that future misuse of artificial intelligence may result in sanctions. in W.D.N.Y.. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Misrepresented Authority
- Civil Rights
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- No tool named in source
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Warning
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.