Case 2025/RK/12
CA Antwerp · Dec 25, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- CA Antwerp
- Record ID
- case-2025-rk-12-2025-12-25
- Observed outcome
- The appeal was declared unfounded. The appellants were ordered to pay 7,500 EUR in damages to each of the three respondents (totaling 22,500 EUR) and a 2,500 EUR statutory fine, plus legal costs.
- Known monetary consequence
- €25,000
Why this matter warrants attention
The Antwerp Court of Appeal sanctioned the appellants for filing a reckless and vexatious appeal. The court explicitly identified that the appellants used a generative AI chatbot to produce incoherent arguments supported by fabricated case law and invented legal sources, which the court deemed an abuse of the judicial system.
Fabricated: Case Law
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Antwerp, with the listed outcome: Monetary Sanction.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Appellate
- Monetary
- AI attribution
- Explicitly Recorded
- Recorded tool
- generative artificial intelligence chatbot service
- Known monetary consequence
- €25,000
- Procedural posture
- Appellate review of a lower court decision regarding a public sale, resulting in a dismissal of the appeal and the imposition of sanctions.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The court identified the use of a generative AI chatbot.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Escalate and correct a suspect filing promptly, with a documented response.