Cesareo v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
D. New Jersey · Dec 31, 2025 · Jamel K. Semper
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- D. New Jersey
- Record ID
- cesareo-v-port-authority-of-new-york-and-new-jersey-2025-12-31
- Observed outcome
- The court denied the plaintiff's Motion for Declaratory Judgment, Motion for Protective Order, and Emergency Motion to Stay Arbitration.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court denied the plaintiff's motions after identifying that the plaintiff relied on fabricated case law and misquoted authorities. The court explicitly noted that one cited case does not exist and that other cited opinions did not contain the language attributed to them by the pro se litigant.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a Ninth Circuit opinion 'Doe v. Bogan, 93 F.3d 544, 551 (9th Cir. 1996),' which the Court was unable to locate and concluded does not appear to exist as cited. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed language to Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, Loc. No. 310, 587 F.2d 1176, 1182 (D.C. Cir. 1978) that the Court could not locate in the opinion (misquoted/attributed language). || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Welling v. Alexy, 155 F.R.D. 654, 657 (N.D. Cal. 1994) for a proposition about irreparable psychological/reputational harm, but the Court was unable to locate that language in the opinion (misquoted).
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. New Jersey, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fabricated Case Law
- Misquoted Case Law
- False Attribution Of Legal Propositions
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The court issued an Opinion and Order denying the pro se plaintiff's Motion for Declaratory Judgment, Motion for Protective Order, and Emergency Motion to Stay Arbitration.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The record implies AI usage through the nature of the hallucinations.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Confirm that every authority actually supports the proposition for which it is offered.