Chapter Kris Jackson v. BOK Financial Corporation et al. (3)
N.D. Oklahoma · Feb 24, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- N.D. Oklahoma
- Record ID
- chapter-kris-jackson-v-bok-financial-corporation-et-al-3-2026-02-24
- Observed outcome
- The court struck the petitioner's objection and all pending motions; the petitioner had previously paid a $405 fine imposed by a Magistrate Judge.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court struck the petitioner's objection and all pending motions due to a persistent pattern of submitting filings with fabricated case law, inaccurate quotations, and misrepresented authorities, despite multiple prior warnings regarding Rule 11 compliance.
Fabricated: Case Law | Multiple quotations in petitioner's motion to disqualify did not appear in the cited cases; Judge Huntsman identified four fake quotations and previously struck the filing. || False Quotes: Case Law | Objection contains an inaccurate/partial quotation attributed to the Rohan case; the quoted material is incomplete and not an accurate quotation from the case. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Petitioner cited 'Badillo v. Thorpe, 158 F. Supp. 2d 177 (D. Conn. 2001),' but that reporter citation corresponds to Tropical Air Flying Services, Inc. v. Carmen Feliciando de Melecio; the actual Badillo v. Thorpe decision is at 158 F. App'x 208 (11th Cir. 2005).
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in N.D. Oklahoma, with the listed outcome: Petition and all pending motions of the petitioner struck under the court's inherent authority, with leave to file an amended petition by 17 March 2026; the court considered and declined more severe sanctions; the USD 405 fine, already paid, was imposed earlier by the Magistrate Judge (ECF 101) and not by this order.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Contract
- Trial
- AI attribution
- Unspecified
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- District Court review of a Magistrate Judge's order imposing sanctions, resulting in the striking of the petitioner's objection and all pending motions.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The court referenced 10th Circuit precedent regarding attorneys using generative AI to submit hallucinated citations.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Confirm that every authority actually supports the proposition for which it is offered.
- Escalate and correct a suspect filing promptly, with a documented response.