Christine Thomas v. United States Department of Justice, et al.
E.D. North Carolina · Jul 15, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- E.D. North Carolina
- Record ID
- christine-thomas-v-united-states-department-of-justice-et-al-2026-07-15
- Observed outcome
- Apologies
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited a non-existent case 'Bowers v. Transp. Sec. Admin., 2015 WL 3442014, at *2 (E.D. Va. May 27, 2015)'; after the Court's order counsel could not locate the opinion and acknowledged it was fabricated, likely originating from an internet/AI-generated search result. Outcome: Apologies.
The structured public record identifies fake citations and employment and records Apologies. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and employment with Apologies in E.D. North Carolina. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Employment
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Apologies
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.