Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-199IYAJGenerated September 10, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Coulson v. ASB Bank

High Court · Nov 11, 2025

Jurisdiction
international
Court
High Court
Record ID
coulson-v-asb-bank-2025-11-11
Observed outcome
The application for an interim injunction was declined, and the court invited submissions regarding the potential strike-out of the underlying proceeding.
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The High Court of New Zealand declined the plaintiff's application for an interim injunction. The court identified that the plaintiff's submissions contained content suggesting the significant use of artificial intelligence and misquoted the law, ultimately finding the arguments meritless and the proceeding an abuse of process.

Why the decision-maker cared

False Quotes: Legal Norm

Why it matters now

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in High Court, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Pro Se
  • Fabricated Quotes
  • Contract
  • Trial
  • None Adjudicated
AI attribution
Explicitly Recorded
Recorded tool
unspecified
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
The court heard an application for an interim injunction and considered whether to strike out the underlying proceeding on its own motion.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

The court noted content suggesting the significant use of artificial intelligence.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Confirm that every authority actually supports the proposition for which it is offered.