Coyne v. Smurl
Lackawanna CCCP · Sep 25, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- state
- Court
- Lackawanna CCCP
- Record ID
- coyne-v-smurl-2026-09-25
- Observed outcome
- None Adjudicated
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
False Quotes: Case Law | The plaintiffs cited “Babac v. Pennsylvania Milk Marketing Board, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 1990” and attributed to it the statement that the Sunshine Act imposes obligations directly upon the agency and its members. The court found no such quotation in Babac or any reported Pennsylvania federal or state case.
The structured public record identifies pro se and fabricated quotes and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects pro se and fabricated quotes with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Lackawanna CCCP. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Administrative
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.