Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-1C1JOW0Generated September 11, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. All Season Power LLC, et al.

C.D. California · Feb 13, 2026

Jurisdiction
federal
Court
C.D. California
Record ID
creditors-adjustment-bureau-inc-v-all-season-power-llc-et-al-2026-02-13
Observed outcome
Warning
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's counsel cited a non-existent (phantom) case in its brief; counsel later admitted the citation was from a non-existent case produced by AI-assisted research and the court noted the error. Outcome: Warning.

Why the decision-maker cared

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's counsel cited a non-existent (phantom) case in its brief; counsel later admitted the citation was from a non-existent case produced by AI-assisted research and the court noted the error. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff's counsel included a quoted passage attributed to a real case, but the quote does not exist in the source—one of three phantom quotes identified in counsel's declaration. || False Quotes: Case Law | A second non-existent quotation was attributed to an existing case in Plaintiff's brief; counsel admitted the quote was erroneous and tied the error to AI-assisted research. || False Quotes: Case Law | A third non-existent quotation (attributed to a real case) was identified; Defendant later acknowledged that one of the same erroneous citations appeared in its reply brief.

Why it matters now

When opposing counsel parrots your bad cite into their reply, both sides get named; require independent verification even of internal brief templates.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Fake Citations
  • Fabricated Quotes
  • Trial
  • Warning
AI attribution
Not Established
Recorded tool
Unidentified
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Warning
PRIMARY SOURCE

reason.com

Secondary or other linked source. The recorded link is not classified as an official court source or docket mirror.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Secondary Source Only (medium confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
  2. Assign a responsible reviewer for AI-assisted research and drafting.
  3. Retain a matter-level record of source checks and corrections.