Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-01XTI2LGenerated September 11, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

David Angel Sifuentes, III v. Christian Brothers Automotive

W.D. Michigan · Nov 6, 2025

Jurisdiction
federal
Court
W.D. Michigan
Record ID
david-angel-sifuentes-iii-v-christian-brothers-automotive-2025-11-06
Observed outcome
The court overruled the plaintiff's objections and adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation in full, denying the plaintiff's motions for leave to appeal in forma pauperis.
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The court identified that the pro se plaintiff included a fabricated case citation in his objections. The court noted this was a repeat offense, as it had previously warned the plaintiff that the cited case, 'Bolin v. Story,' does not exist.

Why the decision-maker cared

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on a nonexistent case citation; court noted 'Bolin v. Story, 225 F.3d 1234, 1239 (6th Cir. 2000)' does not exist and had been previously warned.

Why it matters now

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in W.D. Michigan, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Pro Se
  • Fake Citations
  • Other
  • Trial
  • None Adjudicated
AI attribution
Reported
Recorded tool
AI (implied, unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Order adopting a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation following the plaintiff's filing of objections.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.