Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-1QAZGI0Generated September 11, 2026Evidence checked Sep 11, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

David Morris Clayman v. Scott Bessant

S.D. Florida · Nov 24, 2025

Jurisdiction
federal
Court
S.D. Florida
Record ID
david-morris-clayman-v-scott-bessant-2025-11-24
Observed outcome
The court denied the plaintiff's motion and issued a final warning regarding the submission of AI-generated hallucinations.
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The court denied the plaintiff's motion and issued a formal warning regarding the use of AI. The judge explicitly cautioned that if the plaintiff continues to include hallucinated cases or law in future filings, the court will consider imposing sanctions and restricting the plaintiff's ability to file documents in the case.

Why the decision-maker cared

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'United States v. Bovio, 708 F. Supp. 2d 579 (E.D.N.Y. 2010)'; the Court found the case does not exist and concluded it was AI-generated; plaintiff conceded and apologized.

Why it matters now

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in S.D. Florida, with the listed outcome: Warning.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Pro Se
  • Fake Citations
  • Civil Rights
  • Trial
  • Warning
AI attribution
Admitted
Recorded tool
Unidentified
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Order denying Plaintiff's Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend a prior court order.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

The court refers to the plaintiff's use of AI generally without naming a specific tool.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.