David Thomas v. The Quikrete Companies, LLC
W.D. Texas · Feb 26, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- W.D. Texas
- Record ID
- david-thomas-v-the-quikrete-companies-llc-2026-02-26
- Observed outcome
- The magistrate judge recommended that the defendant's motion for summary judgment be granted and the plaintiffs' motion be denied.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court identified that the plaintiffs' briefing included fabricated quotations and misrepresentations of Fifth Circuit precedent, specifically regarding the case Ash v. Flowers Foods, Inc. While the court noted these errors in the official record, it did not impose a formal sanction, instead proceeding to resolve the underlying summary judgment motions on their merits.
Fabricated: Case Law || False Quotes: Case Law | The plaintiffs' briefing allegedly 'manufacture[d] or cite[d] hallucinated quotations' attributed to the Fifth Circuit's decision in Ash v. Flowers Foods, Inc.; the court notes the quoted language does not appear in Ash.
Pull every quote from the reporter text before filing — hallucinated Fifth Circuit quotes surface fast in opposition.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fabricated Case Law
- False Quotations
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Employment
- Trial
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge on cross-motions for summary judgment.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The record does not name a specific tool, implying AI usage through the nature of the errors.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Retain a matter-level record of source checks and corrections.