Devin A. Robinson v. Velosio, LLC
D. Maryland · May 4, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- D. Maryland
- Record ID
- devin-a-robinson-v-velosio-llc-2026-05-04
- Observed outcome
- The court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the third amended complaint with prejudice.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court acknowledged the plaintiff's inclusion of non-existent cases and fabricated quotations in his response brief. The plaintiff filed a declaration attempting to explain these errors, but the court did not issue a formal sanction for the conduct, ultimately dismissing the case on other substantive grounds.
The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is the response recorded in the linked source; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
This case illustrates the risks of pro se litigants utilizing unverified research, potentially generated by AI, leading to the inclusion of fabricated authorities. It highlights the necessity for courts to address such errors while maintaining focus on the substantive merits of the litigation.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Employment
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the third amended complaint with prejudice, noting the plaintiff's prior submission of a declaration regarding citation inaccuracies.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Apply the same source-checking controls to AI (implied, unspecified) output as to any other research input.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.