Doe v. Noem
D. DC · Jul 1, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- D. DC
- Record ID
- doe-v-noem-2025-07-01
- Observed outcome
- Order to Show Cause
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Outcome: Order to Show Cause. Fake citation, in this brief, was to : Moms Against Poverty v. Dep’t of State, 2022 WL 17951329, at *3 . Case docket can be found here.Counsel later confirmed having used ChatGPT and apologised.
The linked record identifies trial and records Order to Show Cause. This page does not infer judicial reasoning beyond the source.
Ban ChatGPT for legal research; apologies after the fact do not cure a Rule 11 violation.
Failure modes and consequences
- Trial
- Ordered To Show Cause
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- ChatGPT
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Order to Show Cause
lawandcrime.com
Secondary or other linked source. The recorded link is not classified as an official court source or docket mirror.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
ChatGPT is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded link is a secondary or other public source and should be checked against the docket where available. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Latest evidence review: Source Unavailable (medium confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Apply the same source-checking controls to ChatGPT output as to any other research input.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.