Ege Kilinc v. PMMUE Eduservices Private Limited, et al.
S.D. New York · Nov 21, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- S.D. New York
- Record ID
- ege-kilinc-v-pmmue-eduservices-private-limited-et-al-2025-11-21
- Observed outcome
- The court ordered the plaintiff to file a sworn statement by December 3, 2025, categorizing all citations as accurate or improper and explaining the source of any inaccuracies.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court ordered the pro se plaintiff to file a sworn statement identifying all accurate and improper citations from a specific filing, including explanations for any inaccuracies and the source of the improper citations. This order serves as a precursor to potential future sanctions pending the court's review of the plaintiff's response.
False Quotes: Case Law | Court found the quoted sentence attributed to Best Van Lines, Inc. v. Walker (2d Cir. 2007) does not appear in that opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Court found the quoted language attributed to C.S. v. Columbia University, Case No. 1:24-cv-03232 (S.D.N.Y. 2024) (Torres, J.) does not appear in any decision on that docket by Judge Torres. || False Quotes: Case Law | Court found the quoted passage attributed to D.D. ex rel. V.D. v. New York City Board of Education (2d Cir. 2006) is not contained in that opinion.
Require attorneys to paste every quoted passage directly from the cited opinion; fabricated quotes trigger sworn-statement orders.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fabricated Quotes
- Civil Rights
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Order issued by Magistrate Judge following discovery of fabricated citations in a reply memorandum.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The nature of the errors implies the use of generative AI, though not explicitly named.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Retain a matter-level record of source checks and corrections.