Eyong v. 72 Barrow St. Realty Corp.
AC Maryland · Aug 11, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- state
- Court
- AC Maryland
- Record ID
- eyong-v-72-barrow-st-realty-corp-2026-08-11
- Observed outcome
- Brief mostly struck; adverse costs order
- Known monetary consequence
- $1
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Opening and reply briefs contained fabricated (fictitious) citations to legal authority; large portions were previously struck by the court for containing these fictitious citations. Outcome: Brief mostly struck; adverse costs order.
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Brief mostly struck; adverse costs order. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Brief mostly struck; adverse costs order in AC Maryland. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Trial
- Monetary
- Struck Filing
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- $1
- Procedural posture
- Brief mostly struck; adverse costs order
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.