Farrow v. John Does
E.D. New York · Dec 3, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- E.D. New York
- Record ID
- farrow-v-john-does-2025-12-03
- Observed outcome
- The complaint was dismissed without prejudice for improper venue.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court identified multiple instances of fabricated case law and misattributed quotes in the plaintiff's filings. While the court characterized this conduct as likely violating Rule 11 and harmful to the judicial process, it did not impose a formal monetary or professional sanction, instead dismissing the case for improper venue.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent decision; the court identified the citation as to a case that does not exist. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a venue rule to In re Aggrenox that does not appear in that opinion; the court noted the case does not analyze venue. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff claimed Martinez v. Bloomberg held that a court on a venue challenge "assumes the truth of the plaintiff's factual allegations," which the court said Martinez did not state. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on Nat'l Acad. of Television Arts & Scis. for a venue principle the opinion did not analyze; the court observed the cited opinion contains no such venue analysis.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in E.D. New York, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Other
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The court dismissed the plaintiff's complaint without prejudice for improper venue following a show-cause order regarding the propriety of venue in the Eastern District of New York.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Confirm that every authority actually supports the proposition for which it is offered.