Feldman & Trost v. District 6 Board of Education
C.D. Illinois · Mar 31, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- C.D. Illinois
- Record ID
- feldman-trost-v-district-6-board-of-education-2026-03-31
- Observed outcome
- The court granted in part and denied in part the motion to dismiss and issued a formal warning to counsel regarding future filings.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court issued a formal warning to the plaintiffs' counsel regarding the inclusion of nonexistent case law and misrepresented legal authorities in their filings. The judge explicitly stated that further instances of such conduct would trigger a show cause hearing and the consideration of sanctions.
The court noted that throughout the briefing, the plaintiffs cited nonexistent cases or real cases for legal conclusions that were not discussed or supported by those opinions. The court specifically identified the citation of a nonexistent Seventh Circuit case and a fabricated quote attributed to a real Tenth Circuit case as examples of this conduct.
Verify every quoted phrase against the opinion text — courts catch the wording, not just the reporter cite.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Civil Rights
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The court issued the warning in an Opinion and Order resolving the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 11) in a civil rights lawsuit.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Apply the same source-checking controls to AI (implied, unspecified) output as to any other research input.