Ferm v. Cameron
D. Utah · Sep 8, 2026
Short answer. Status: Warning: the court found the plaintiff's quotations inaccurate or non-existent in the cited cases, reminded him he had already been cautioned, and warned him again (Doc. 23, pp. 2-3); amount: no amount stated. D. Utah, decision date on record September 8, 2026. As of November 8, 2026. Court source · Methodology
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Court
- D. Utah
- Record ID
- ferm-v-cameron-2026-09-08
- Observed outcome
- Warning: the court found the plaintiff's quotations inaccurate or non-existent in the cited cases, reminded him he had already been cautioned, and warned him again (Doc. 23, pp. 2-3)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Second Circuit authority and attributed quotations to cases that, according to the Court, were either inaccurate or nonexistent in the cited decisions. The Court did not identify the individual case names or quotations in this order. Outcome: Warning: the court found the plaintiff's quotations inaccurate or non-existent in the cited cases, reminded him he had already been cautioned, and warned him again (Doc. 23, pp. 2-3).
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Warning: the court found the plaintiff's quotations inaccurate or non-existent in the cited cases, reminded him he had already been cautioned, and warned him again (Doc. 23, pp. 2-3). The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning: the court found the plaintiff's quotations inaccurate or non-existent in the cited cases, reminded him he had already been cautioned, and warned him again (Doc. 23, pp. 2-3) in D. Utah. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Other
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- No tool named in source
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Warning: the court found the plaintiff's quotations inaccurate or non-existent in the cited cases, reminded him he had already been cautioned, and warned him again (Doc. 23, pp. 2-3)
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.