Garcia v. City of Monte Vista, Colorado et al.
D. Colorado · Sep 29, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- D. Colorado
- Record ID
- garcia-v-city-of-monte-vista-colorado-et-al-2026-09-29
- Observed outcome
- Disclosure requirement
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
False Quotes: Case Law | The motion attributed nonexistent language to the real Tenth Circuit decision Miller v. Spiers. The court found that the quotation did not appear in the cited case and held that counsel’s failure to verify the quotation violated Rule 11(b). Outcome: Disclosure requirement.
The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Disclosure requirement. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Disclosure requirement in D. Colorado. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Civil Rights
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Disclosure requirement
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.