Garibay-Robledo v. Noem
N.D. Texas · Jan 9, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- N.D. Texas
- Record ID
- garibay-robledo-v-noem-2026-01-09
- Observed outcome
- The court denied the petition for habeas corpus and issued a formal warning to counsel for the submission of fabricated legal authority.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court issued a formal warning to counsel for citing a non-existent Fifth Circuit case and including a fabricated quotation in their filings. Counsel admitted the citation originated from a Facebook comment. The court reminded counsel of their obligations under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 regarding the duty to verify legal authority.
Fabricated: Case Law | The petition relied on a non-existent Fifth Circuit case; counsel later admitted the citation came from a Facebook comment and the Court flagged the error. || False Quotes: Case Law | The reply brief contained a fabricated quotation that the Court identified and referenced when granting leave to file a corrected petition.
Never cite authority sourced from social media or unvetted forums; treat every citation as requiring a primary-source check.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fabricated Case Law
- Fabricated Quotations
- Unverified Social Media Sourcing
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Immigration
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The court addressed the merits of a habeas corpus petition while simultaneously addressing counsel's submission of fabricated legal authority, ultimately denying the petition and issuing a Rule 11 warning.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The court identified fabricated citations and quotes typical of AI-assisted drafting.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Use only approved research and drafting tools for legal work.
- Retain a matter-level record of source checks and corrections.