Gilles Dulac c. Ville de Gatineau
TA Québec · Oct 11, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- TA Québec
- Record ID
- gilles-dulac-c-ville-de-gatineau-2025-10-11
- Observed outcome
- The Tribunal rejected the applicant's evidence and maintained the original municipal property valuation.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The Tribunal administratif du Québec identified that the pro se applicant cited five nonexistent or erroneous case law references in his submissions. The Tribunal explicitly stated that its searches failed to locate these decisions, noting they were either nonexistent or incorrectly cited.
The Tribunal determined that the applicant's cited jurisprudence was irrelevant or nonexistent, specifically noting that five cited decisions could not be found in its searches and were deemed nonexistent or erroneous.
Quebec tribunals routinely flag pro-se AI citations as nonexistent; verify every QCTAQ reference on CanLII.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Administrative
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Administrative appeal regarding municipal property tax assessment before the Tribunal administratif du Québec.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The Tribunal identified nonexistent citations, a common indicator of AI hallucination.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Apply the same source-checking controls to AI (implied, unspecified) output as to any other research input.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.