Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-02VWO1TGenerated September 11, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Happiness Idehen & Felix Ogieva v. Gloria Stoute-Phillip

N.Y. Civil Court · Jul 29, 2025

Jurisdiction
state
Court
N.Y. Civil Court
Record ID
happiness-idehen-felix-ogieva-v-gloria-stoute-phillip-2025-07-29
Observed outcome
Monetary Sanction; referral to the Bar
Known monetary consequence
$1,000
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

Fabricated: Case Law | Party said he wanted to cite "Liggett v. Lew Realty." LaSalle" Outcome: Monetary Sanction; referral to the Bar. After being ordered to show cause, Counsel submitted a brief that compounded the issue."The Court was dismayed to see that some of the discussion/analysis provided by Mr.…

Why the decision-maker cared

The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Monetary Sanction; referral to the Bar; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.

Why it matters now

Never file AI-generated case summaries verbatim; telltale AI disclaimers in briefs trigger bar referrals.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Fake Citations
  • Misrepresented Authority
  • Trial
  • Monetary
  • Bar Referral
  • Professional
AI attribution
Reported
Recorded tool
MS Copilot
Known monetary consequence
$1,000
Procedural posture
Monetary Sanction; referral to the Bar
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

MS Copilot is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
  2. Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
  3. Escalate unresolved verification failures before filing and preserve the responsible reviewer's signoff record.
  4. Apply the same source-checking controls to MS Copilot output as to any other research input.