In re Lusine Hakhverdyan
C.D. California (Bankruptcy) · Mar 3, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- C.D. California (Bankruptcy)
- Record ID
- in-re-lusine-hakhverdyan-2026-03-03
- Observed outcome
- The court denied the debtor's motions to vacate extension orders, strike stipulations, and sanction opposing counsel.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court identified that the debtor's filings contained fabricated or inaccurate case law citations. While the court explicitly noted these errors in its memorandum of decision, it did not issue a formal sanction or disciplinary finding against the party for the use of AI or inaccurate research, ultimately denying the debtor's motions on substantive legal grounds.
Fabricated: Case Law | Court observed Debtor cited 'Whittaker v. Otto, 2014 WL 37845 (9th Cir.)' which does not correspond to the authority described; the citation leads to an unrelated case (Harmer) and is inaccurate/nonexistent as cited. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court observed Debtor cited 'In re Chionis, 531 B.R. 52' which is incorrect; Chionis is not at that reporter citation and is an unpublished BAP decision (In re Chionis, 2013 WL 6840485 (9th Cir. BAP Dec. 27, 2013)).
This record documents a Lawyer filing issue in C.D. California (Bankruptcy), with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Published Opinion
- Bankruptcy
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Memorandum of Decision denying the debtor's motions to vacate extension orders, strike stipulations, and sanction opposing counsel.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.