In re the Matter of: Abius Rosas Carreon
CA Arizona · Feb 4, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- state
- Court
- CA Arizona
- Record ID
- in-re-the-matter-of-abius-rosas-carreon-2026-02-04
- Observed outcome
- The court vacated the lower court's decree in part and issued a formal warning to the appellee regarding the quality of legal citations.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court issued a formal warning to the appellee regarding the use of AI-generated content in legal filings. It found that the appellee's brief contained fabricated quotations and incomplete citations, violating appellate rules. The court explicitly stated that future failures to provide accurate legal authority may result in sanctions.
False Quotes: Case Law | Court found Father's brief contained fabricated quotations attributed to cited cases; quotations were not supported by the authorities. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court observed several incomplete and defective citations in Father's brief suggesting invented or fabricated authority. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Court identified misrepresentation of authorities where cited cases were used to support premises the Court found unsupported by those authorities.
Warnings today become fines tomorrow; treat any court-flagged fabricated quote as a firm-level incident.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fabricated_quotations
- Incomplete_citations
- Unsupported_legal_premises
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Appellate review of a superior court decree; the appellate court vacated the decree in part and remanded for further proceedings.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The court noted the brief's defects were a sign of AI use.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.