In re Troylond Malon Wise
W.D. Louisiana (Bankruptcy) · Apr 9, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- W.D. Louisiana (Bankruptcy)
- Record ID
- in-re-troylond-malon-wise-2026-04-09
- Observed outcome
- The court struck the offending pleadings, imposed a $2,750 monetary sanction, and barred the attorney from new filings until she completes six hours of in-person AI-focused CLE.
- Known monetary consequence
- $2,750
Why this matter warrants attention
The court sanctioned attorney Kathleen M. Wilson for violating Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9011(b)(2) by filing AI-generated pleadings containing fabricated case law and statutes. The court ordered a $2,750 monetary penalty, struck the misleading filings, and prohibited the attorney from practicing in the district until she completes six hours of in-person AI-focused continuing legal education.
The court reasoned that the attorney failed her professional responsibilities under Rule 9011 by filing pleadings without verifying the accuracy of AI-generated citations. The court determined that sanctions were necessary to deter future misconduct, noting that the attorney's admission and the case being a matter of first impression in the district justified a lower monetary penalty than in similar precedents.
Complete AI-ethics CLE and verify every citation against primary sources before filing any pleading.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Bankruptcy
- Trial
- Monetary
- Struck Filing
- AI attribution
- Admitted
- Recorded tool
- Generative AI (unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- $2,750
- Procedural posture
- Following an Order to Show Cause, the court issued a final order on sanctions on April 9, 2026, after the attorney admitted to the misconduct.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The attorney admitted to using generative AI to create the pleadings.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Escalate unresolved verification failures before filing and preserve the responsible reviewer's signoff record.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.