J.D. v. Kern County DHS
CA California · Jul 31, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- state
- Court
- CA California
- Record ID
- jd-v-kern-county-dhs-2025-07-31
- Observed outcome
- Warning
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Misrepresented: Legal Norm | According to father, “Welfare and Institutions Code § 350(b) states, ‘Except where otherwise provided by this code, the procedures for the trials or hearings shall be in accordance with that prescribed by law for civil cases.’ ” Section 350, subdivision (b) does not so provide, and we have been unable to verify the legal source for this quotation Outcome: Warning.…
The record concerns whether quotations and pincites accurately matched the cited source. The tracked outcome is Warning; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Fabricated statutory quotes violate Rule 3.3 even without monetary sanctions — verify every statute's text against the code before quoting.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Appellate
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- No tool named in source
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Warning
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Latest evidence review: Metadata Only (medium confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Apply the same source-checking controls to AI (implied, unspecified) output as to any other research input.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.