JF v Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Social Security Tribunal · Dec 24, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- Social Security Tribunal
- Record ID
- jf-v-canada-employment-insurance-commission-2025-12-24
- Observed outcome
- The appeal was dismissed; the tribunal found no good cause for the delay in filing.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The Social Security Tribunal of Canada dismissed the appellant's appeal, ruling that he failed to establish 'good cause' for his delay in filing benefits claims. The tribunal explicitly rejected four cited cases as non-existent, noting that the provided citations corresponded to unrelated legal authorities.
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'Gagnon v Canada, 1999 FCA 8976' which does not exist; tribunal found only Helsi Construction Management Inc. v Canada (Attorney General), 1999 CanLII 8976 (FCA) under that number and held it was unrelated, so the cited authority could not be considered. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'Lafleur v Canada, 2004 FCA 155' which does not exist; tribunal found the citation corresponds to Séguin v Canada, 2004 FCA 155, which is unrelated and thus the cited authority could not be considered. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'Kienast v Canada, 2004 FCA 128' which does not exist; tribunal found the citation leads to Fraser v Canada (Attorney General), 2004 FCA 128, which is unrelated and therefore not relied upon. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'Lussier v Canada, 2005 FCA 91' which does not exist; tribunal found the citation corresponds to Fernandopulle v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FCA 91, unrelated to antedating, so it could not be considered.
Tribunals routinely check neutral citation numbers against CanLII and find mismatched authorities.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Administrative
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The matter was heard in writing by the Social Security Tribunal of Canada, General Division – Employment Insurance Section, resulting in a final decision dismissing the appeal.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The tribunal identified that the appellant submitted non-existent cases, implying the use of an AI tool.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.