Jordan v. Beskrone (In re Prehired LLC)
D. Delaware (Bankruptcy) · Dec 12, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- D. Delaware (Bankruptcy)
- Record ID
- jordan-v-beskrone-in-re-prehired-llc-2025-12-12
- Observed outcome
- The court granted the defendant's motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court dismissed the plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint after identifying that it contained fabricated case citations and misrepresented legal authorities, which the court attributed to the misuse of generative AI. The court concluded that the plaintiff failed to state any claim upon which relief could be granted.
Fabricated: Case Law | Complaint included citations to opinions that do not exist; court identified these fabricated citations (noted in June 9, 2025 letter) and attributed them to likely AI misuse. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Complaint cited In re Marvel Ent. Grp. as supporting a heightened-duty proposition; court found the case does not support that proposition and flagged the citation as likely AI-generated. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Complaint cited other real opinions that did not plausibly stand for the propositions asserted by plaintiff; court treated these as misrepresentations likely from generative AI.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Delaware (Bankruptcy), with the listed outcome: Second Amended Complaint dismissed.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Bankruptcy
- Trial
- Case Dismissed
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- Generative artificial intelligence (unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The court granted the defendant's motion to dismiss the plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint in an adversary proceeding within a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The court attributed errors to the misuse of generative artificial intelligence.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Confirm that every authority actually supports the proposition for which it is offered.